The fourth industrial revolution is presently taking place throughout the world. This revolution was greatly influenced by the development of digital media. The range of socio-political activism was altered. Global communication has been profoundly altered by technology breakthroughs, with social media platforms like Facebook, X, Instagram, Snapchat, Telegram, and WeChat at the forefront. The study explores how social media has changed activism in the modern day by highlighting how it can increase access, visibility, scope, and empowerment. Examining well-known movements including (...) the Greta Thunberg climate change protest, #MeToo, #BlackLivesMatter, and the Anti-Discrimination Movement in Bangladesh, the analysis delves deeply into the dynamics of digital activism. Despite democratising freedom of speech and fostering global connectivity, social media has drawbacks such as false information, divisiveness, and performative activism, and privacy concerns. This may halt the movement. The globe is currently moving towards a more sophisticated technical development. It is anticipated that activism in the future will become more digital, propelled by innovations in technology like virtual reality and artificial intelligence. In order to protect user data and guarantee social media's effectiveness as a weapon for social change, the study emphasises the necessity of responsible platform management. (shrink)

Until, 1971, articles were not freely accessible to everyone online. Project Gutenberg made the dream a reality. Exorbitant increases in the cost of print journals have forced publishers to reduce their publications and turn them from the print to the electronic journal (e-journal) medium. Higher visibility of Open Access (OA) leads to a higher number of citations, better h-index of authors and the Impact Factor (IF) of journals, which gains the popularity of e-journals. However, authors face a problem in predatory (...) journals, Article Processing Charges (APC), etc. It is not late to write this article for in-depth understanding of e-journals and the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in academic scholarships, especially for novice readers, authors, and researchers. This article also depicts what important things you need to keep in mind when publishing your article to go to a higher level in the era of electronic publication. (shrink)

This paper explores the issue of racial bias in artificial intelligence (AI) through the lens of the bioethical principle of justice, with a focus on Joy Buolamwini’s “Coded Bias” and the work of the “Algorithmic Justice League.” AI technologies, particularly facial recognition systems, have been shown to disproportionately misidentify individuals from marginalised racial groups, raising profound ethical concerns about fairness and equity. The bioethical principle of justice stresses the importance of equal treatment and the protection of vulnerable populations. Through qualitative (...) research, including content analysis of Buolamwini’s works and case studies of AI bias, this paper assesses the efforts of the Algorithmic Justice League to combat racial bias in AI. It emphasises their advocacy for the development of fair, equitable algorithms and calls for systemic reform in AI development to ensure justice for marginalised communities. (shrink)

The ever-growing volume of scientific research challenges for traditional publishing models. This necessitates innovative approaches to journal editing and adopting by Artificial Intelligence (AI) in publication. This scoping review aims to explore the emerging trends shaping the field of journal editing by AI. Literature employed to search relevant databases published between 2008 and 2024. A total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. The review synthesizes key trends of inclusion of the technological tools integration for manuscript processing, the rise of (...) open-access publishing models, and evolving considerations around research ethics. The study underscores the pivotal role of emerging trends in shaping the future of scientific publishing. It offers valuable perspectives for editors to adeptly maneuver through the evolving terrain of scholarly communication. By suggesting possible best practices, it serves as a beacon for maintaining editorial excellence. Furthermore, it identifies critical domains warranting deeper exploration, thereby setting the stage for continuous advancement in the field. This forward-looking approach not only facilitates informed decision-making but also fosters a proactive stance towards embracing change in scientific discourse. (shrink)