- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Concepts of science
Baltimore,: Johns Hopkins University Press (1968)
Abstract
In this systematic study, Professor Achinstein analyzes such concepts as definitions, theories, and models, and contrasts his view with currently held positions that he finds inadequate.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Peter Achinstein, "Concepts of Science: A Philosophical Analysis".Henry E. Kyburg - 1971 - Synthese 22 (3-4):488.
"Concepts of Science: A Philosophical Analysis," by Peter Achinstein. [REVIEW]Richard J. Blackwell - 1972 - Modern Schoolman 50 (1):131-131.
ACHINSTEIN, P. - "Concepts of Science: A Philosophical Analysis". [REVIEW]K. K. Baublys - 1973 - Mind 82:463.
Concepts of Science. By Peter Achinstein. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968. Pp. xvi + 266. $8.95.Alex C. Michalos - 1969 - Dialogue 8 (1):159-161.
Concepts of Science: A Philosophical Analysis. [REVIEW]H. K. R. - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):745-746.
Concepts of Science.Raymond T. Grontkowski - 1970 - International Philosophical Quarterly 10 (4):667-670.
Concepts of Science By Peter Achinstein London: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971, vii + 206 pp. £1.20. [REVIEW]Erik Millstone - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (187):106-.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-09-15
Downloads
131 (#167,846)
6 months
11 (#343,210)
2009-09-15
Downloads
131 (#167,846)
6 months
11 (#343,210)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Theories of Reference: What Was the Question?Panu Raatikainen - 2020 - In Andrea Bianchi (ed.), Language and reality from a naturalistic perspective: Themes from Michael Devitt. Cham: Springer. pp. 69–103.
Reinflating the semantic approach.Steven French & James Ladyman - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (2):103 – 121.
Models in physics.Michael Redhead - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (2):145-163.
On What We Know We Don’t Know.Sylvain Bromberger - 1992 - Chicago and London / Stanford: University of Chicago Press / CSLI.
When scientific models represent.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):59 – 74.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2