Reuse or re-function?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):266-267 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Simple specialization cannot account for brain functioning. Yet, we believe Anderson's reuse can be better explained by re-function. We suggest that functional demands shape brain changes and are the driving force behind reuse. For example, we suggest that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is built as an infrastructure for multi-functions rather than as a module for reuse

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Multi-use and constraints from original use.Justin A. Jungé & Daniel C. Dennett - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):277-278.
Reuse of molecules and of neural circuits.Mark Reimers - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):288-289.
Reuse in the brain and elsewhere.Björn Lindblom - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):282-283.
Neural reuse and cognitive homology.Vincent Bergeron - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):268-269.
Neural reuse and human individual differences.Cristina D. Rabaglia & Gary F. Marcus - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):287-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
37 (#611,759)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?