Coherence and Argumentation or the Genuine Twin Criterialess Super Criterion

In Aulis Aarnio, On coherence theory of law. [Lund]: Distribution, Akademibokhandeln i Lund. pp. 41--9 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Coherence—Criterion and Nature of Truth.Robert Tad Lehe - 1983 - Idealistic Studies 13 (3):177-189.
Coherence.Ken Kress - 1996 - In Dennis M. Patterson, A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell. pp. 521–538.
Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?Stefano Bertea - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):433-446.
The Coherence Theory of Truth. [REVIEW]S. C. A. - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (4):810-811.
Coherence and Systematization in Law.Amalia Amaya - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski, Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 637-672.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-29

Downloads
3 (#1,867,272)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references