The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality

Ratio Juris 3 (s1):130-147 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main idea or the concept of coherence can be expressed in the following way: The more the statements belonging to a given theory approximate a perfect supportive structure, the more coherent the theory. The degree of perfection of a supportive structure depends on the degree to which the following criteria of coherence are fulfilled: (1) the greatest possible number of supported statements belonging to the theory in question; (2) the greatest possible length of chains of reasons belonging to it; (3) the greatest possible number of strongly supported statements belonging to the theory; (4) the greatest possible number of connections between various supportive chains belonging to the theory; (5) the greatest possible number of preference relations between various principles belonging to it; (6) the greatest possible number and complexity of reciprocal supportive relations between various statements belonging to the theory; (7) the greatest possible number of universal statements belonging to the theory; the greatest possible number of general concepts belonging to it; the highest possible degree of generality of concepts implemented within it; the greatest possible number of resemblances between concepts used within it; (8) the greatest possible number of conceptual cross‐connections between various theories; (9) the greatest possible number of cases covered by the theory; and (10) the greatest possible number of fields of life covered by the theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Infinite Decision Puzzle.Jeffrey Barrett & Frank Arntzenius - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (1):101-103.
The greatest possible being.Jeffrey Speaks - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
John Stuart Mill.Raphael Cohen-Almagor - 1986 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 20:169-169.
Democracy is an exercise in modesty.Albert Camus - 2001 - Sartre Studies International 7 (2):12-14.
Is Hume a "Classical Utilitarian"?Ronald J. Glossop - 1976 - Hume Studies 2 (1):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
217 (#118,116)

6 months
13 (#262,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Teleological arguments and theory-based dialectics.Giovanni Sartor - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):95-112.
Coherence, evidence, and legal proof.Amalia Amaya - 2013 - Legal Theory 19 (1):1-43.
Legal stories and the process of proof.Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):253-278.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references