Diagrammatic Agency Versus Aesthetic Regime of Contemporary Art: Ernesto Neto's Anti-Leviathan

Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 6 (1):6-26 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ernesto Neto's installation at the Panthéon in Paris, Leviathan Toth (2006), brings us into a semiotics of intensities that does not belong to the ‘aesthetic regime’ as described by Jacques Rancière but rather to a Diagrammatic Agency of Contemporary Art. In this case study, the latter is constructed after Deleuze and Guattari – from a politics of the Body without Organs critically and clinically identified to a Body without Image

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-03

Downloads
93 (#223,521)

6 months
11 (#320,308)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Alliez
Kingston University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia.Gilles Deleuze - 1987 - London: Athlone Press. Edited by Félix Guattari.
We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Anti-Oedipus.Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari - 1972 - Minnesota University Press.
Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation.Gilles Deleuze - 2003 - Minneapolis: Univ of Minnesota Press.
The future of the image.Jacques Ranciere - 2009 - New York: Verso. Edited by Gregory Elliott.

View all 6 references / Add more references