- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Encapsulation, inference and utterance interpretation
Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
Abstract
1. People standardly communicate by uttering phrases or sentences with certain intonation patterns, accompanied by facial expressions, eye contact and often a variety of gestures. If all goes well...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines.Ipke Wachsmuth, Manuela Lenzen & Günther Knoblich (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Speaker meaning, utterance meaning and radical interpretation in Davidson’s ‘A nice derangement of epitaphs’.Imogen Smith - 2017 - Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 8 (2):205-219.
I. Linguistic-pragmatic approaches to inference in law. Telling it slant : toward a taxonomy of deception / Laurence R. Horn ; Cooperation in Chinese courtroom discourse / Meizhen Liao and Yadi Sun ; Inference and intention in legal interpretation / Nicholas Allott and Benjamin Shaer ; Pragmatics and legal texts : how best to account for the gaps between literal meaning and communicative meaning / Brian G. Slocum ; One ambiguity, three legal approaches. [REVIEW]Lawrence M. Solan - 2017 - In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), The pragmatic turn in law: inference and interpretation in legal discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis.Robert Stainton - 1997 - Pragmatics and Cognition 5 (1):51-78.
The semantics of human facial expressions.Anna Wierzbicka - 2000 - Pragmatics and Cognition 8 (1):147-184.
Does linguistic communication rest on inference?François Recanati - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (1-2):105–126.
Uttering sentences made up of words and gestures.Philippe De Brabanter - 2007 - In E. Romero & B. Soria (eds.), Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston's Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Using non-sentences: An application of Relevance Theory.Robert Stainton - 1994 - Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (2):269-284.
Generating Facial Expressions for Speech.Catherine Pelachaud, Norman I. Badler & Mark Steedman - 1996 - Cognitive Science 20 (1):1-46.
The explanatory project of Gricean pragmatics.Lars Dänzer - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (5):683-706.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-10-15
Downloads
42 (#523,325)
6 months
10 (#377,653)
2023-10-15
Downloads
42 (#523,325)
6 months
10 (#377,653)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Perceiving meaning and the argument from evidence-insensitivity.Yavuz Recep Başoğlu - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
References found in this work
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects.Chaz Firestone & Brian Scholl - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-72.
Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias.Eric Mandelbaum - 2015 - Noûs 50 (3):629-658.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2