Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy [Book Review]

Common Knowledge 8 (2):422-422 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In theory, sovereignty makes a state. In practice, few states possess all its attributes, and little is governed by its norms. That's no recent development, but as old as the idea of the "sovereign state." Nor is it surprising. The politics of sovereignty is an exercise in organized hypocrisy: Espouse its norms, generously disburse its recognition, and violate it all when convenient. Hypocrisy is the norm because unlike a game of chess, international politics has no constitutive rules — rules you have to follow as the price of playing the game. Parties do anything they can get away with. All is fair in war and war.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

[Book review] sovereignty, organized hypocrisy. [REVIEW]Stephen D. Krasner - 2000 - Ethics and International Affairs 14:163-165.
About the Impossibility of Absolute State Sovereignty: The Early Years.Jorge Emilio Núñez - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (4):645-664.
The Logic of Freedom and Power.Timothy Endicott - 2010 - In Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.), The philosophy of international law. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 245-259.
Philosophy Looks at Chess.Benjamin Hale (ed.) - 2008 - Open Court Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
39 (#585,164)

6 months
8 (#622,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barry Allen
McMaster University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references