- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A new approach to regulating the use of animals in science
Bioethics 4 (1):45–54 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Animal Care Committees Animal Experimentation Animal Welfare Animals Attitude Australia Biomedical and Behavioral Research Evaluation Studies as Topic Government Regulation Humans Pain Reference Standards Research Design Research Personnel Risk Risk Assessment Social Control, Formal Social Control, Informal
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Testing the implementation of clinical guidelines.Harold I. Goldberg & Helen McGough - 1990 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 13 (6):1-7.
The unlicensed physician in the research institution.Angela R. Holder - 1985 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 7 (3):5-6.
Research with transgenic animals: obligations and issues.Gary Comstock - 1998 - Journal of Biolaw and Business 2 (1):51-55.
Ethics committees, principles and consequences.M. Hayry - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (2):81-85.
Exempting All Minimal-Risk Research from IRB Review: Pruning or Poisoning the Regulatory Tree?Mahesh Ananth & Mike Scheessele - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (2):9-14.
The regulation of animal research and the emergence of animal ethics: A conceptual history. [REVIEW]Bernard E. Rollin - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):285-304.
Minimal risk, administrative firm trials, and informed consent.T. J. O'Neil, H. Goldberg & H. McGough - 1991 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 14 (3):9-10.
Vulnerable Subjects? The Case of Nonhuman Animals in Experimentation.Jane Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):497-504.
OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories.Helen McGough - 1997 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 20 (1):9-11.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
28 (#837,946)
6 months
5 (#702,808)
2009-01-28
Downloads
28 (#837,946)
6 months
5 (#702,808)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs.Thérèse Leroux, Claude Dumas & Lise Houde - 2003 - Ethics and Behavior 13 (4):333-350.
The animal's point of view, animal welfare and some other related matters.Marc Bekoff - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):753-755.
The pervasiveness of species bias.Peter Singer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):759-761.
Toward positive animal welfare.Clive Hollands - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):757-758.
Humans' use of animals: On the horns of a moral dilemma.Brian Everill - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):756-756.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-kjfxj dc2