Legein to What End?

Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (2):176-182 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the 5th century a number of sophists challenged the orthodox understanding of morality and claimed that practicing injustice was the best and most profitable way for an individual to live. Although a number of responses to sophistic immoralism were made, one argument, in fact coming from a pair of sophists, has not received the attention it deserves. According to the argument I call Immortal Repute, self-interested individuals should reject immorality and cultivate virtue instead, for only a virtuous agent can win the sort of everlasting reputation that makes a life truly admirable and successful.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-17

Downloads
268 (#100,630)

6 months
74 (#82,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Merrick Anderson
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Says Who? Modes of Speaking in the Euthydemus.Fiona Leigh - 2019 - Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (2):123-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references