Making reification concrete: A response to Bruineberg et al

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e186 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The principal target of this article is the reification Bruineberg et al. perceive of formalism within the literature on the variational free energy minimization (VFEM) framework. The authors do not provide a definition of reification, as none yet exists. Here I offer one. On this definition, the objects of the authors' critiques fall short of full-blown reification – as do the authors themselves.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maps and territories, smoke, and mirrors.Karl Friston - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e195.
What is Reification? A Critique of Axel Honneth.Timo Jütten - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):235-256.
The reification of the mind-body problem?Stewart H. Hulse - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):139-140.
Reification.Robert Sinclair - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce, Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 378–381.
The ethical demands of reification.Westerman Richard - 2021 - Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 9 (2):51-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-01

Downloads
53 (#453,362)

6 months
5 (#853,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mel Andrews
University of Cincinnati (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations