Some Disputed Questions on Our Knowledge of Being

Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):550 - 568 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The latter quality can be cultivated by the metaphysician through considering the intimate link between signification and being. The impossibility of separating the two is highlighted by the fact that even "non-being" is significant as a sign of the simple negative judgment, x is not. For this sign assuredly is. And a "square circle," mathematically and physically nonexistent, has the "being" of an incompatible conjunction of signs severally significant.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Being, Essence and Existence For St. Thomas Aquinas.William M. Walton - 1950 - Review of Metaphysics 3 (3):339-366.
Subjectivity and the Encounter with Being.Jason M. Costanzo - 2015 - Review of Metaphysics 68 (3):593-614.
On Talking about Non-Existents.Clive Ingram-Pearson - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (3):352 - 360.
The Question of Being.Robert Sokolowski - 1990 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (4):707 - 716.
Being and Not-Being. [REVIEW]R. J. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (3):567-568.
Byt i Znak. [REVIEW]Andrew N. Woznicki - 1986 - Review of Metaphysics 40 (2):408-409.
Being Qua Being. [REVIEW]U. S. - 1980 - Review of Metaphysics 33 (3):620-621.
Being and Possibility: A Reply.Richard L. Barber - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (4):605 - 616.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
35 (#651,090)

6 months
8 (#603,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?