Bird in hand: How experience makes nature [Book Review]

Theory and Society 42 (4):351-368 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is almost a truism that nature is social, but by what means is nature made social at the level of the interactional encounter? While the transformation of society/nature relationships is often approached through the problematic of distance, and at the scale of macro-historical transformation, this article uses a conflict between American birdwatchers and ornithologists over scientific “collecting” (literally, the killing of birds) to examine the processes through which individuals come to know nature, and come to know it so differently. With John Dewey’s (1958 [1925]) “experience” as the unit of analysis, I trace changes in each group’s experience with birds over the past century; the phenomenology of the resulting encounters; and the understanding that emerges from each in order to understand (1) how, empirically, these two very different loves of birds are formed, and (2) knowledge of nature as an affective sensibility shaped by experiences of closeness.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
75 (#280,653)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Marxism and Literature.Raymond Williams - 1977 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 13 (1):70-72.
Does "consciousness" exist?William James - 1904 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 1 (18):477-491.
Does 'Consciousness' Exist?William James - 1904 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1 (18):477-491.
Does Consciousness Exist?William James - 1904 - Journal of Philosophy 1 (18):477.

View all 12 references / Add more references