Engels’ Fourfold Revenge: On the Implications of Neglecting Engelsian Dialectics in Science, Philosophy, Ecology, and Revolutionary Practice

Marxism and Sciences 1 (1):13–35 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper confronts the familiar prejudice in Western Marxism that Engels’ thought, as articulated in Anti-Duhring and the Dialectics of Nature, is of marginal interest and should be excised from Marxist theory. I argue that this view is mistaken. If we do not take seriously his insights about science, philosophy, nature, and history, his insights will take a fourfold revenge upon us. Natural science takes its revenge by unleashing technology that subjugates us in ways we cannot anticipate, understand or control. Philosophy, in turn, takes revenge on science for neglecting the philosophical presuppositions of its own worldview. Nature itself takes its revenge upon those who consider it to be some formless and passive matter, deprived of history and negativity, responding to our productive activity in surprising ways that, without a rational form of regulation, could lead to our own extinction. Lastly, history takes revenge on those ‘well intentioned’ actors who try to impose their will upon it without a scientific knowledge of its internal, necessary, and objective forces.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marx and Engels on Planetary Motion.Kaan Kangal - 2018 - Beiträge Zur Marx-Engels-Forschung. Neue Folge 1 (2016/17):202-224.
Friedrich Engels and Dialectics of Nature.Kaan Kangal - 2020 - London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alethic vengeance.Kevin Scharp - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), The Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Engels’ Intentions in Dialectics of Nature.Kaan Kangal - 2019 - Science and Society 83 (2):215-243.
Friedrich Engels and the technoscientific reproducibility of life.H. A. E. Zwart - 2020 - Science and Society : A Journal of Marxist Thought and Analysis 84 (3):369- 400.
Engels' Great Book.B. M. Kedrov - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):3-26.
Forgiveness, Revenge, and the Shape of a Life.Mark Taylor - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Oklahoma

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-13

Downloads
437 (#66,457)

6 months
89 (#69,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rogney Piedra Arencibia
Queen's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The dialectical biologist.Richard Levins - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Lewontin.
Discourse on Method.René Descartes - 1950 - Harmondsworth,: Harmondsworth, Penguin.
The Grundrisse.Karl Marx & David Mclellan - 1972 - Science and Society 36 (1):91-92.

View all 14 references / Add more references