Moby-Dick and Compassion

Society and Animals 12 (1):19-37 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Because the notions of "anthropomorphism" and "sentimentality" often are used pejoratively to dismiss research in human-animal studies, there is much to be gained from ongoing and detailed analysis of the changing "structures of feeling" that shape representations and treatments of nonhuman animals. Literary criticism contributes to this project when it pays due attention to differences in historical and cultural contexts. As an example of this approach, a reading of the humanization of cetaceans in Herman Melville's Moby-Dick - and more broadly in nineteenth-century whaling discourse - demonstrates how radically human feelings for nonhuman species are affected by shifting material and ideological conditions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,839

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
56 (#415,874)

6 months
7 (#592,519)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Writing For and Not Merely About.Hadas Marcus - 2020 - Journal of Animal Ethics 10 (2):192-202.

Add more citations

References found in this work

We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Marxism and Literature.Raymond Williams - 1977 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 13 (1):70-72.
Poetic animals and animal souls.Randy Malamud - 1998 - Society and Animals 6 (3):263-277.

View all 9 references / Add more references