The Two Faces of Binding Precedents: A Hohfeldian Look

Ratio Juris 37 (1):25-47 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taking into account one of the meanings of the expression binding precedent and stipulating a definition for that meaning, this article aims to contribute to the concept's structural characterization. By this I mean the effort to identify the legal norms on which the existence and functioning of binding precedents depend and to show that these norms constitute a group of Hohfeldian legal relations between the courts whose precedents must be followed, the courts that must follow them, and the individuals whose legal situations are as a result modified by the observance and the breach of those precedents.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-06

Downloads
34 (#654,249)

6 months
14 (#214,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

María Beatriz Arriagada
Universidad Diego Portales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Pure theory of law.Hans Kelsen - 1967 - Clark, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange.
How to derive "ought" from "is".John R. Searle - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58.
Introduction to Logical Theory.P. F. Strawson - 1954 - Philosophy 29 (108):78-80.

View all 13 references / Add more references