On determinacy or its absence in the brain

In Richard Swinburne, Free Will and Modern Science. New York: OUP/British Academy (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the different ways to describe brain behaviour with the goal to provide a basis for an informed discussion of the nature of decisions and actions that humans perform in their lives. The chapter is organized as follows. Section 2 outlines a number of concepts exhibiting how many subtle details and distinctions lie behind the broad notions of determinacy and stochasticity. These details are necessary for a discussion, in Section 3, of particular aspects relevant for the characterization of brain states and their dynamics. The descriptions of brain behaviour currently provided by neuroscience depend on the level and context of the descriptions. There is no clear-cut evidence for ultimately determinate or ultimately stochastic brain behaviour. As a consequence, there is no solid neurobiological basis to argue either in favour of or against any fundamental determination or openness of human decisions and actions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free Will and Modern Science.Richard Swinburne (ed.) - 2011 - New York: OUP/British Academy.
Chaotic dynamics and psychophysical parallelism.Robert A. M. Gregson - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):541-542.
Addiction, neuroscience and ethics.Wayne Hall - 2003 - Addiction 98 (7):867-870.
Design, development and decisions.P. Bateson - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):635-646.
Dualism and the determination of action.Richard Winburne - 2011 - In Richard Swinburne, Free Will and Modern Science. New York: OUP/British Academy.
Neuroscience and folk psychology: An overview.David Hodgson - 1994 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (2):205-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-30

Downloads
44 (#563,553)

6 months
1 (#1,597,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Can Reasons and Values Influence Action: How Might Intentional Agency Work Physiologically?Raymond Noble & Denis Noble - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (2):277-295.
Traditional Compatibilism Reformulated and Defended.Markus E. Schlosser - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Research 42:277-300.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references