Do the birds and bees need cognitive reform?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):666-667 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stanovich & West argue that their observed positive correlations between performance of reasoning tasks and intelligence strengthen the standing of normative rules for determining rationality. I question this argument. Violations of normative rules by cognitively humble creatures in their natural environments are more of a problem for normative rules than for the creatures.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Situational constraints on normative reasoning.Earl Hunt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):680-680.
What about motivation?Anton Kühberger - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):685-685.
Similarity in logical reasoning and decision-making.Horacio Arló-Costa - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):14-15.
Rational distinctions and adaptations.D. E. Over & J. St B. T. Evans - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):693-694.
Why the analyses of cognitive processes matter.Ulrich Hoffrage - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):679-680.
The Role of Rules.Ota Weinberger - 1988 - Ratio Juris 1 (3):224-240.
Games, Rules, and Conventions.William J. Morgan - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (3):383-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#306,123)

6 months
13 (#264,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Ayton
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references