Reply to Commentators

Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (1):79-94 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Response to commentary by author of original keynote article

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

original Baars, B. (1997) "Reply to Commentators". Journal of Consciousness Studies 4(4):347-364

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Commentators.B. Baars - 1997 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 4 (4):347-364.
Reply to Commentators.Elizabeth Schechter - 2022 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 29 (1-2):179-203.
Reply to commentators.Review author[S.]: David Papineau - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (3):687-697.
Reply to Commentators.Francis Sparshott - 1997 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 31 (2):61.
Reply to commentators.Alison Gopnik - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (4):552-561.
Reply to commentators.Review author[S.]: Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):187-194.
Reply to commentators.Review author[S.]: Charles Taylor - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1):203-213.
Reply to commentators.Review author[S.]: Eli Hirsch - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):223-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-13

Downloads
32 (#713,415)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

First-person Methodologies.Varela Francisco & Shaer Jonathan - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (2-3):1-14.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness.Bernard J. Baars - 1988 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Analysis of Mind.Bertrand Russell - 1921 - London, England: Allen & Unwin.
The Analysis of Mind.Bertrand Russell - 1925 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 5 (5):152-153.

View all 12 references / Add more references