Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency

Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):28-55 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Against the Manichees, Augustine argued that sin must involve a free exercise of will. Otherwise it will not count as the agent's own act for which the agent is morally responsible. In the 390's, however, Augustine became convinced that only the first humans sinned by free exercise of will. This view faced him with the question: how is it that unambiguously good agents come to will the evil? Augustine found no satisfactory solution, and the first evil will appears, on his reckoning, to be either a random outcome or due to a withholding of grace. Despite his best efforts, his account of moral agency in evil remains flawed

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Know the Dark Side”: A Theodicy of the Force.Jason T. Eberl - 2015 - In Jason T. Eberl & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate Star Wars and Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 100–113.
La libertad agustiniana.María Del C. Dolby Múgica - 2004 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 11:49.
Pursuing Pankalia: The Aesthetic Theodicy of St. Augustine.A. G. Holdier - 2015 - In Benjamin McCraw & Robert Arp (eds.), The Problem of Evil: New Philosophical Directions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. pp. 69-83.
Augustine on Evil and Original Sin.William E. Mann - 2016 - In God, Belief, and Perplexity. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
91 (#231,663)

6 months
13 (#265,352)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?