First, do no harm

Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (1):64-66 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a television news documentary series such as Boston Med, doctors’ duty to their patients may be at odds with the duty of TV journalists to their audience. If this happens, who should win out? The patients. If there is any possibility that harm is being done to patients, we must put them first, and turn off the cameras

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/jce201324108

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Watching Boston Med.Walter M. Robinson - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (1):67-69.
The ethics of reality medical television.T. M. Krakower, M. Montello, C. Mitchell & R. D. Truog - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (1):50-57.
The best place for bare-knuckled ethics.Edmund G. Howe - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (1):3-10.
Minimal risk, administrative firm trials, and informed consent.T. J. O'Neil, H. Goldberg & H. McGough - 1991 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 14 (3):9-10.
What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.C. Behrendt, T. Golz, C. Roesler, H. Bertz & A. Wunsch - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):74-80.
"Third generation" ethics: what careproviders should do before they do ethics.Edmund G. Howe - 2010 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (1):3-13.
What is the moral basis of the authority of family members to act as surrogates for incompetent patients?Dan W. Brock - 1991 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 3 (2):121-123.
Toward a Naturalized Clinical Ethics.Marian Verkerk & Hilde Lindemann - 2012 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (4):289-306.
Studying fraud: is insurance claim information confidential?Angela R. Holder - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 12 (4):4-4.
Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients.Christopher K. Daugherty, Donald M. Banik, Linda Janish & Mark J. Ratain - 1999 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 22 (3):6-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
19 (#1,077,071)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references