Medical ethics' appropriation of moral philosophy: The case of the sympathetic and the unsympathetic physician

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):3-22 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophy textbooks typically treat bioethics as a form of "applied ethics"-i.e., an attempt to apply a moral theory, like utilitarianism, to controversial ethical issues in biology and medicine. Historians, however, can find virtually no cases in which applied philosophical moral theory influenced ethical practice in biology or medicine. In light of the absence of historical evidence, the authors of this paper advance an alternative model of the historical relationship between philosophical ethics and medical ethics, the appropriation model. They offer two historical case studies to illustrate the ways in which physicians have "appropriated" concepts and theory fragments from philosophers, and demonstrate how appropriated moral philosophy profoundly influenced the way medical morality was conceived and practiced

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
136 (#161,048)

6 months
17 (#163,572)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Laurence McCullough
Baylor College of Medicine
Robert Baker
George Washington University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references