Morality, structure, transcendence and theism: A response to Melissa Lane's reading of Charles Taylor's sources of the self [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 54 (1):33-48 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

16 page

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Charles Taylor's sources of the self: A transcendental apologetic? [REVIEW]D. P. Baker - 2000 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47 (3):155-174.
“The Vision Thing”: Charles Taylor Against Inarticulacy.John E. Becker - 1991 - Ethics and International Affairs 5:53–71.
The Difference between Moral Sources and Hypergoods.Jasper van Buuren - 2016 - International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2):171-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
110 (#193,947)

6 months
12 (#294,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

X*—The Validity of Transcendental Arguments.Charles Taylor - 1979 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (1):151-166.
Quandary Ethics.Edmund Pincoffs - 1998 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical Theory 2: Theories About How We Should Live. Oxford University Press UK.
Pragmatic and transcendental arguments for theism: A critical examination. [REVIEW]Sami Pihlström - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (3):195-214.

Add more references