Paul and political theology

Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (3):293-315 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nihilism, for Nietzsche, is the nothing that results from the devaluation of the highest values. There is widespread agreement with Nietzsche’s claim that the apostle Paul was the great devaluer of the values of the ancient world, even to the extent of breaking the history of the world in two. Yet the mode of Paul’s devaluating nihilism is contested. Using Nietzsche’s three types of nihilist, I frame this debate over Paul as giving us, respectively, Paul the reactive nihilist (Nietzsche), Paul the active nihilist (Taubes) and Paul the overman (Badiou). I then read Agamben’s messianic Paul as a way to avoid the problem of nihilism tout court, which the two earlier accounts, despite releasing Paul from Nietzsche’s charge of passive nihilism, do not. I finish by arguing that while Agamben’s construction of the Pauline messianic vocation does indeed break with Nietzsche’s categories of nihilism, nihilism remains necessary to a genealogy of both Paul’s and Agamben’s messianism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-02

Downloads
43 (#543,787)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The dialectics of Paul: on exception, grace, and use in Badiou and Agamben.Gert-Jan van der Heiden - 2016 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 77 (3):171-190.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references