Updating Anselm Again

Res Philosophica 90 (1):23-32 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I set out four general facts about things that we can refer to and talk about, whether they exist or not. Then, I set out an argument for the existence of God. Myargument, like Anselm’s original argument, is a reductio ad absurdum: It shows that the assumption that God does not exist leads to a contradiction. Theargument is short and in ordinary language. Each line of the argument, other than the reductio premise, is justified by one of the general facts. Finally, I consider some traditional objections to Anselm’s argument, and show how my updated version avoids them.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against an Updated Ontological Argument.Eric Yang - 2017 - Res Philosophica 95 (1):179-187.
The Ontological Argument and Objects of Thought.Edward Wierenga - 2011 - Philosophic Exchange 42 (1):82-103.
Locating the Lost Island.William E. Mann - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (2):295-316.
Does Anselm beg the question?Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):5-18.
Anselm’s Argument Reconsidered.Gareth B. Matthews - 2010 - Review of Metaphysics 64 (1):31-54.
LeMans and Proslogion 15.Stephen Harrop - 2023 - Analysis 83 (1):50-54.
Anselm's Argument: Divine Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2022 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Saint Anselm and Gaunilo on the Existence of God.P. Alpár Gergely - forthcoming - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia:75-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
193 (#127,822)

6 months
13 (#262,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Rudder Baker
PhD: Vanderbilt University; Last affiliation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

Saint Anselm.Thomas Williams - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reasons to Believe - Theoretical Arguments.Marcus Hunt - 2020 - In Beau Branson, Hans Van Eyghen, Marcus Hunt, Tim Knepper, Robert Sloan Lee & Steven Steyl (eds.), Introduction to Philosophy: Philosophy of Religion. Rebus Community Press. pp. 22-33.
Against an Updated Ontological Argument.Eric Yang - 2017 - Res Philosophica 95 (1):179-187.
On the PROVER9 Ontological Argument.T. Parent - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):475-483.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vacuous names and fictional entities.Saul A. Kripke - 2011 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 8 (2):676-706.
The ontological argument.Gareth B. Matthews - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 80–102.
Reply to Oppy's fool.G. B. Matthews & L. R. Baker - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):303-303.

View all 6 references / Add more references