Epistemic Tolerance

In Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Henrike Jansen, Jan Albert Van Laar & Bart Verheij (eds.), Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Vol. II. College Publications. pp. 27-39 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When it comes to political, religious or ethical issues, many people consider a tolerant “live and let live”-attitude to be the best reaction to disagreement. However, the current debate about the epistemic significance of disagreement within social epistemology gave rise to certain worries about the epistemic rationality of tolerance. Setting aside those already extensively discussed worries, I would like to focus on the instrumental rationality of a tolerant attitude with respect to our epistemic goals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,067

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Warum intellektuelle Toleranz nicht irrational ist.Dominik Balg - 2020 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):51-78.
Epistemic Tolerance and Religious Diversity.Natika Krongyoot - 2023 - In Soraj Hongladarom, Jeremiah Joven Joaquin & Frank J. Hoffman (eds.), Philosophies of Appropriated Religions: Perspectives from Southeast Asia. Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 353-363.
Gibt es so etwas wie intellektuelle Toleranz?Dominik Balg - 2020 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 97 (2):319-342.
Gibt es so etwas wie intellektuelle Toleranz?Dominik Balg - 2020 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 97 (2):319-342.
Moral disagreement and moral skepticism.Katia Vavova - 2014 - Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):302-333.
Religious Disagreement and Pluralism.Matthew A. Benton & Jonathan L. Kvanvig (eds.) - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness: A minimal theory.Patrick Greenough - 2003 - Mind 112 (446):235-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-14

Downloads
47 (#481,912)

6 months
14 (#221,450)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominik Balg
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references