Beyond Social Science Naturalism: The Case for Ecumenical Interpretivism

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3-4):454-461 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The epistemological and methodological wars that bedevil social science often pit those who follow in the footsteps of natural science and those who favor a more holistic, interpretive approach. Into this war-torn landscape, Mark Bevir and Jason Blakley have dropped a plea for interpretive social science that will surely serve as a touchstone for years to come. However, their anti-naturalism is of the methodologically ecumenical kind, with the qualitative toolkit cohabiting with mass surveys, large-N statistics, and other quantitative methods under well-specified conditions. The book’s insights therefore dovetail with emerging ecumenical trends in international political economy and even economics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-02

Downloads
27 (#833,502)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Naturalism and Its Inadvertent Defenders.Mark Bevir & Jason Blakely - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3-4):489-501.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references