Justification of Science Etc

Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Believers and non-believers often take it for granted that traditional religious faith is, in principle, incapable of the sort of justification which might be given to a scientific theory. Yet how are scientific theories justified and is it the case that religious belief cannot satisfy the same standards of rationality? Based on a critical examination of recent accounts of the nature of science and of its justification given by Kuhn, Popper, Lakatos, Laudan, and Newton-Smith, this book contends that models of scientific rationality which are used in criticism of religious belief are in fact often inadequate as accounts of the nature of science. It is argued that a realist philosophy of science both reflects the character of science and scientific justification, and also suggests that religious belief could be given a justification of the same sort.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-26

Downloads
10 (#1,474,523)

6 months
3 (#1,477,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Banner
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references