Are Large Cardinal Axioms Restrictive?

Philosophia Mathematica 31 (3):372-407 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The independence phenomenon in set theory, while pervasive, can be partially addressed through the use of large cardinal axioms. A commonly assumed idea is that large cardinal axioms are species of maximality principles. In this paper I question this claim. I show that there is a kind of maximality (namely absoluteness) on which large cardinal axioms come out as restrictive relative to a formal notion of restrictiveness. Within this framework, I argue that large cardinal axioms can still play many of their usual foundational roles.

Other Versions

manuscript Barton, Neil (manuscript) "Are Large Cardinal Axioms Restrictive?".

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,126

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incompatible bounded category forcing axioms.David Asperó & Matteo Viale - 2022 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (2).
Closed Maximality Principles and Generalized Baire Spaces.Philipp Lücke - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (2):253-282.
Implications between strong large cardinal axioms.Richard Laver - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 90 (1-3):79-90.
The hidden use of new axioms.Deborah Kant - 2023 - In Carolin Antos, Neil Barton & Giorgio Venturi, The Palgrave Companion to the Philosophy of Set Theory. Palgrave.
Resurrection axioms and uplifting cardinals.Joel David Hamkins & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (3-4):463-485.
Generic large cardinals as axioms.Monroe Eskew - 2020 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):375-387.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-26

Downloads
55 (#433,466)

6 months
10 (#382,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Barton
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Universism and extensions of V.Carolin Antos, Neil Barton & Sy-David Friedman - 2021 - Review of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):112-154.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals.F. R. Drake & T. J. Jech - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):187-191.
Universism and extensions of V.Carolin Antos, Neil Barton & Sy-David Friedman - 2021 - Review of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):112-154.
Elementary embeddings and infinitary combinatorics.Kenneth Kunen - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (3):407-413.
On the question of absolute undecidability.Peter Koellner - 2010 - In Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson, Kurt Gödel: essays for his centennial. Ithaca, NY: Association for Symbolic Logic. pp. 153-188.

View all 33 references / Add more references