Categorical modelling of Husserl's intentionality

Husserl Studies 6 (1):25-41 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the application of constructions from category theory to Smith and McIntyre's interpretation of Husserl's intentionality. 1 Not only did Hussefl's own ideas change in the course of his lifetime 2 but there are a number of interpretations of Husserl's work 3 so that the line of philosophical investigation that Husserl strongly influenced is still in the process of development. In this vein, Smith and McIntyre have recognized the potential for a possible worlds interpretation of intentionality in Hussefl's writing 4 which has led them to extend their interpretation to give a many worlds account of intentionality. 5 Thus, while Smith and McIntyre have refuted interpretations of Husserl's noema in terms of ideal objects, they have been willing to explicate the noerna using possible objects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,964

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#250,523)

6 months
5 (#718,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mathematizing phenomenology.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):271-291.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references