Promoting Equity in Health Through Research and Understanding

Developing World Bioethics 4 (1):76-95 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTDeveloping strategies to reduce inequities in health requires an understanding of how inequities occur, determining the salient factors in their production, and deciding which ones are most amenable to change. The recognition of several principles regarding the manifestations and genesis of inequities can help to decide on strategies. In making decisions, it is important to consider whether the aim is to reduce disparities in the occurrence of ill health or to reduce disparities in the severity of ill health. Evidence shows that the major impact on equity of health services, particularly regarding their potential to reduce severity, is attributable to the strength of primary care resources and services in communities and countries. Virtually every influence on the genesis of inequities is determined by the political context in which policy is made. The issue of health services is not different in this regard from other types of strategies.There is no longer any doubt about the pervasive influence of social factors on health. Almost two centuries of descriptive research provides convincing evidence of associations between social structures and relationships and health status in all countries and in all societies; if there is anything new from more recent research, it is that the association is not limited to differences between the lowest social strata and other social strata. Rather, the association is noted throughout the social spectrum. That is, there is a social gradient in health such that, for many if not most manifestations of ill health, the lower the social stratum, the worse the health.The challenge for the future is to understand why this is the case, to create a consensus that these inequalities are unnecessary and unacceptable, and to devise strategies that are both effective and possible. This paper will focus on the first of these aims, in a context that facilitates attention to the second and third aims

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Framework for Advancing Health Care in Pakistan.Sumaira Khowaja-Punjwani - 2013 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 23 (6):207-211.
Equity, Equality and Justice in Social Science Research in Africa.Melany L. Hendricks & Gordon M. Donnir - 2019 - In Nico Nortjé, Retha Visagie & J. S. Wessels (eds.), Social Science Research Ethics in Africa. Springer Verlag. pp. 181-196.
Health equity and social justice.Fabienne Peter - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):159–170.
Socioeconomic status and health care.P. M. Lantz - 2001 - In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier. pp. 14558--14562.
Looking Closely at Health Inequities.Mildred Z. Solomon - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (2):inside_front_cover-inside_front_.
The Impact of Inequality.Richard G. Wilkinson - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (2):711-732.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
429 (#66,423)

6 months
8 (#574,086)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167-198.

Add more references