Puritanical morality: Cooperation or coercion?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e294 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The suggestion that there is a need to moralize bodily pleasures for uncooperative self-control failures doesn't fit with the historical record. I counter that the development of puritanical values was an instrument of coercion and control, rather than an adaptation for cooperation. Confusing cooperation with coercion and moral principles with conventional norms leads to misconceptions about societal arrangements.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral emotions underlie puritanical morality.Ruida Zhu & Chao Liu - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e321.
Little puritans?Christina Starmans - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-05

Downloads
13 (#1,320,757)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention.S. J. Eggleston & Elliot Turiel - 1985 - British Journal of Educational Studies 33 (2):186.

Add more references