Sex differences: Empiricism, hypothesis testing, and other virtues

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):276-277 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating” delivers on its title. By combining empiricism and careful hypothesis testing, it not only contributes to our current knowledge but also points the way to further advances.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x05230054

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sociosexuality from argentina to zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating.David P. Schmitt - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):247-275.
Sociosexuality and sex ratio: Sex differences and local markets.John Lazarus - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):288-288.
Fitting data to theory: The contribution of a comparative perspective.Steve Stewart-Williams - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):294-295.
Human mating models can benefit from comparative primatology and careful methodology.Agustin Fuentes - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):602-603.
A comprehensive theory of human mating must explain between-sex and within-sex differences in mating strategies.April L. Bleske & David M. Buss - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):593-594.
Measuring sociosexuality across people and nations: Revisiting the strengths and weaknesses of cross-cultural sex research.David P. Schmitt - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):297-304.
Why Go There? Evolution of Mobility and Spatial Cognition in Women and Men.Elizabeth Cashdan & Steven J. C. Gaulin - 2016 - Human Nature 27 (1):1-15.
Analyses of mating differences within-sex and between-sex are complementary, not competing.Todd K. Shackelford, Gregory J. LeBlanc, Richard L. Michalski & Viviana A. Weekes - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):621-621.
A few tips on hypothesis testing.Jennifer Nerissa Davis - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):600-601.
Sex differences in the design features of socially contingent mating adaptations.David M. Buss - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):278-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#559,342)

6 months
11 (#338,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references