The Decision Phases Framework for Public Engagement: Engaging Stakeholders about Gene Editing in the Wild

Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):48-61 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some experts and advocates propose environmental biotechnologies such as genetic engineering, gene drive systems, and synthetic biology as potential solutions to accelerating rates of species loss. While these tools may offer hope for a seemingly intractable problem, they also present potential governance challenges for which innovative decision‐making systems are required. Two of the perennial governance challenges include, when are broader stakeholder groups involved in these decisions and who exactly should be involved? We propose the decision phases framework—which includes research and development, regulatory review, and deployment, management, and monitoring—as a framework for identifying which stakeholders might be best suited for different phases throughout the innovation and deployment of emerging environmental biotechnologies for species protection.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-14

Downloads
15 (#1,232,057)

6 months
4 (#1,247,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Do artifacts have politics?Langdon Winner - 1980 - Daedalus 109 (1):121--136.
38.Daniel Barben, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin & David Guston - 2007 - In Edward Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch & Judy Wajcman (eds.), Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology. MIT Press. pp. 979-1000.

Add more references