The Monstrosity of Matter in Motion

Philosophy Today 60 (1):25-43 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Along the path opened by Galileo’s mechanics, early modern mechanical philosophy provided the metaphysical framework in which ‘matter in motion’ underwent a process of reduction to mathematical description and to physical explanation. The struggle against the monstrous contingency of matter in motion generated epistemological monsters in the domains of both the natural and civil science. In natural philosophy Descartes’s institution of Reason as a disembodied subject dominated the whole process. In political theory it was Hobbes who opposed the artificial unity of the body politic to the monstrous multiplicity of the multitude. Through a parallel analysis of the basic structure of Descartes’s and Hobbes’s enterprises, this article explains in which sense Hobbes’s peculiar form of materialism is in fact to be considered a surreptitious reduction of materialism to its ideological counterpart, Cartesian dualism, and to its implicit political-pedagogical project.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-16

Downloads
84 (#257,751)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Bardin
Padua/Oxford Brookes

Citations of this work

The Monstrosity of Philosophy.Igor E. Klyuakanov - 2019 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (8):98-121.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references