The Tactile Eye

Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Going to the movies is a sensual experience. When we say we are moved by a film, that it touches us, or that we respond to it viscerally, we mean it in a more-than-metaphorical sense. These claims imply an intimate and distinctly tactile relationship between film and viewer that is an important factor in our attraction and response to the movies. "The Tactile Eye" examines the tactility of the film experience, asking how films' meaning and significance are made at our fingertips and in the very deepest recesses of our bodies. The project considers the film and viewer to be in a relationship of tactile contact and reciprocity, a view that is indebted to existential phenomenology's descriptions of subjectivity and perception as well as to descriptions of the relationship between the senses that have emerged in disciplines such as philosophy, anthropology, psychology, and art criticism. ;"The Tactile Eye" demonstrates that the filmgoer's tactile experience and behaviors are in fact shared in some way by the film. The relationship between viewer and film is not anthropomorphic; instead, it's a matter of shared styles of touch, and the differences between film's body and viewer's body in this respect are as important as the similarities. Each chapter illustrates a few specific modes of touch as they occur within three locales of the spectator's body and the film itself: the skin, the musculature, and the viscera, which are considered in terms of their phenomenological significance rather than, or in addition to, their physiological definitions. ;Each chapter offers close analyses not only of films but also, and more importantly, of film experiences that exhibit a certain style of tactile behavior that is shared, though enacted in distinct ways, by the film and viewer. These analyses, whose subjects include early cinema, experimental films, animation, art films, action films, and silent comedies, for example, employ phenomenological description as a means of seeing more clearly what the body already feels. Ultimately, the project demonstrates that our fascination with cinema stems from a tactile resonance and reciprocity between the film and the viewer, which are experienced sensually and subjectively

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sensing Film Performance.Sean Redmond - 2019 - In Stuart Grant, Jodie McNeilly-Renaudie & Matthew Wagner (eds.), Performance Phenomenology: To the Thing Itself. Springer Verlag. pp. 165-183.
Subjectivity in Film: Mine, Yours, and No One’s.Sara Aronowitz & Grace Helton - 2024 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11.
A Reflection of the Sun ( ).Sydney Harvey - 2024 - Film and Philosophy 28:1-18.
The Real in Film and Its Impact.Juraj Oniscenko - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (7):655-666.
Drastik und Erhabenheit.Benjamin Moldenhauer - 2015 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 63 (1).
Videogames and Film.Jon Robson & Aaron Meskin - 2019 - In Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa & Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Springer. pp. 971-994.
The Ontology of Film.Julie N. Books - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
3 (#1,854,468)

6 months
3 (#1,484,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Differential Theory of Cinematic Affect.Lisa Åkervall - 2021 - Deleuze and Guattari Studies 15 (4):571-592.
Rethinking contact: the haptic in the viral era.Valentina Bartalesi - 2021 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 14 (1):23-36.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references