Circumventing the Metaphysical Deduction

Idealistic Studies 54 (3):241-261 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant’s derivation of the table of categories from logical functions of judgments in the metaphysical deduction remains one of the least convincing arguments of the Critique of Pure Reason. This article presents an alternative approach to the question of the a priori origin of the table of categories. By circumventing the metaphysical deduction, I show the possibility of demonstrating the exact functions and necessity of the twelve categorial forms as emerging from the interaction of the synthetic unity of apperception with the manifold content of the a priori intuition of space and time. I argue that this a priori material of cognition imposes a constraint on the spontaneity of understanding, thus giving rise to the specific rules of synthesis that make up the table of categories. On the reading I suggest, the table of categories can be understood as expressing the a priori form of self-consciousness in the face of space and time.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-29

Downloads
131 (#177,336)

6 months
131 (#46,096)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Berker Basmaci
The New School

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mind and world: with a new introduction.John Henry McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood.
Lectures on logic.Immanuel Kant (ed.) - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references