Miracles and natural explanations

Sophia 26 (3):22 - 26 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IN A RECENT DISCUSSION ON THE MIRACULOUS, ROBERT LARMER ARGUES THAT THERE ARE CONCEIVABLE OCCURRENCES FOR WHICH IT WOULD BE MOST REASONABLE TO BELIEVE NO NATURAL EXPLANATION WILL BE FORTHCOMING. IN RESPONSE I ARGUE THAT THERE ARE NO SUCH OCCURRENCES. IT IS, IN PRINCIPLE, ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE TO MAINTAIN THAT ANY CONCEIVABLE EVENT IS THE PRODUCT OF SOLELY NATURAL CAUSAL FACTORS

Other Versions

reprint Basinger, David (1996) "Miracles and Naturalistic Explanations". In Larmer, Robert A. H., Questions of Miracle, pp. 83-87: Carleton University Press (1996)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Questions of Miracle.Robert A. H. Larmer (ed.) - 1996 - Carleton University Press.
Questions of Miracle.Robert A. Larmer - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):189 - 190.
Miracles as Evidence for Theism.David Basinger - 1990 - Sophia 29 (1):56 - 59.
Miracles and coincidences.Ian Walker - 1983 - Sophia 22 (3):29-36.
Miracles: Metaphysics, physics, and physicalism.Kirk McDermid - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (2):125-147.
Recent discussions on miracles.Tan Tai Wei - 1972 - Sophia 11 (3):21-28.
Against Miracles.John Collier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):349-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#498,365)

6 months
6 (#825,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The probabilistic argument from evil.Alvin Plantinga - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (1):1 - 53.
Miracles and criteria.Robert Larmer - 1984 - Sophia 23 (1):5 - 12.

Add more references