Boycotted Hospital: The National Anti-Vivisection Hospital, London, 1903–1935

Journal of Animal Ethics 6 (2):177-187 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The National Anti-Vivisection Hospital opened to patients in 1903, the only district hospital in London not financed by state-controlled funds, which refused it support because of its principles. For three decades the hospital treated the local poor and conscientious objectors to vivisection, who were assured that staff pledged not to experiment on animals or patients. After an overambitious building program, the hospital ran into financial difficulties, and the King’s Fund refused to help unless all references to antivivisection were removed from its statutes. Thus it reopened as Battersea General in 1935, continuing to serve the borough until 1972.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The “Permanent” Patient Problem.Courtenay R. Bruce & Mary A. Majumder - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (1):88-92.
The moral responsibility of the hospital.Richard T. De George - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):87-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-09

Downloads
22 (#969,010)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references