On the Ambiguity of Pleasure and Play

Theory, Culture and Society 35 (4-5):233-250 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This lecture argues for a theory of play that departs from the Freudian analysis of pleasure and pain that associates pleasure with the resolution of a psychic tension or anxiety rather than with play and its ambiguities. It advances the idea that poetry, the domain of the aesthetic, eroticism, as well as that of the sacred involve forms of play. Play is here conceptualized in its positive aspect as an experience beyond reflective consciousness or calculation and that relates instead to the improbable, the fascinating, the risky and thus to the death instinct. To that extent, the decisive part of play concerns the role of the unconscious in its elaboration. It is from such a perspective that it proposes the identity of pleasure and play.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

History and Play: Johan Huizinga and His Critics.Robert Anchor - 1978 - History and Theory 17 (1):63-93.
Play, Idleness and the Problem of Necessity in Schiller and Marcuse.Brian O'Connor - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1095-1117.
Aesthetic Melancholy.Hans Maes - 2023 - Contemporary Aesthetics 21.
Play and Aesthetics in Ancient Greece.Stephen E. Kidd - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.
Ethical Habituation and Pleasure.Paul O'Leary - 2007 - Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 16 (1):41-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-11

Downloads
55 (#379,980)

6 months
5 (#1,002,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references