Defending the One Percent?

The Harvard Review of Philosophy 21:106-112 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses and criticizes Greg Mankiw's recent defense of "the one percent".

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/harvardreview2014218

Other Versions

original Baumann, Peter (2014) "Defending the One Percent? Poor Arguments for the Rich?". The Harvard Review of Philosophy XXI 21():106-112

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Defending the One Percent? Poor Arguments for the Rich?Peter Baumann - 2014 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy XXI 21:106-112.
International Justice and Health: A Proposal.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 16 (2):81–90.
The distributive justice theory of self-defense: A response to Whitley Kaufman.Re'em Segev - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1).
On inequality.Harry G. Frankfurt - 2015 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
The Right to Exist: The Position of Universal Basic Income in the Works of the Most Influential Contemporary Philosophers.Shamsaddin Amanov - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Szeged
Introduction: Two Opposing Conceptions of Distributive Justice.Nurdane Şimşek, Stephen Snyder & Manuel Knoll - 2018 - In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder & Nurdane Şimşek, New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 1-20.
Optimal inequality behind the veil of ignorance.Che-Yuan Liang - 2017 - Theory and Decision 83 (3):431-455.
Gender.Anca Gheaus - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti, The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 389-414.
Response to John D'Arcy May's Review of Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference: How Some Thought-Motifs from Derrida Can Nourish the Catholic-Buddhist Encounter by Robert Magliola.Robert Magliola - 2017 - Buddhist-Christian Studies 37:291-293.
Epistemic Contextualism: A Defense.Peter Baumann - 2016 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
35 (#701,484)

6 months
6 (#683,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Baumann
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references