Not so deep inconsistency: a reply to Eklund

&
Australasian Journal of Logic 5:74-84 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his “Deep Inconsistency?” Eklund attacks arguments to the effect that some contradictions are true, and especially those based on the liar paradox, to be found in Priest’ In Contradiction. The point of this paper is to evaluate his case.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.26686/ajl.v5i0.1787

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Beall and Priest.Matti Eklund - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Logic 6:94-106.
Old Wine in (Somewhat Leaky) New Bottles: Some Comments on Beall.Graham Priest - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (5).
A Solução Paraconsistente ao Paradoxo do Mentiroso.R. Ongaratto - 2023 - Alamedas 11 (2):75-88.
Book Notes. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):147-151.
Dialetheists’ Lies About the Liar.Jonas R. B. Arenhart & Ederson S. Melo - 2018 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 22 (1):59-85.
Remarks on naive set theory based on lp.Hitoshi Omori - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):279-295.
Review of Graham Priest, JC Beall, Bradley Armour-garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. [REVIEW]Roy Cook - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (9).
On Using Inconsistent Expressions.Arvid Båve - 2012 - Erkenntnis 77 (1):133-148.
True and false–as if. Ch. 12 of G. Priest, Jc Beall and B. Armour-Garb.Jc Beall - 2004 - In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), The law of non-contradiction : new philosophical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saving Proof from Paradox: Gödel’s Paradox and the Inconsistency of Informal Mathematics.Fenner Stanley Tanswell - 2016 - In Peter Verdée & Holger Andreas (eds.), Logical Studies of Paraconsistent Reasoning in Science and Mathematics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 159-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-11

Downloads
66 (#319,277)

6 months
14 (#225,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jc Beall
University of Notre Dame
Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
Dialetheism.Francesco Berto, Graham Priest & Zach Weber - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2018 (2018).
Dialetheism.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
More on 'A Liar Paradox'.Richard G. Heck - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):270-280.
Paradojas, contradicción y principios constitutivos del significado.Diego Tajer - 2013 - Páginas de Filosofía (Universidad Nacional del Comahue) 14 (17):49-65.

Add more citations

References found in this work

In contradiction: a study of the transconsistent.Graham Priest - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Doubt Truth to Be a Liar.Graham Priest - 2007 - Studia Logica 87 (1):129-134.
Inconsistent Languages.Matti Eklund - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):251-275.
Deep Inconsistency.Matti Eklund - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):321-331.
True and false–as if. Ch. 12 of G. Priest, Jc Beall and B. Armour-Garb.Jc Beall - 2004 - In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), The law of non-contradiction : new philosophical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references