The Missing Shade of Blue as a Proof Against Proof

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):35-44 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/09608780903422214

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The structure of Descartes's ontological proof.John Edward Abbruzzese - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):253 – 282.
Malebranche's criticism of Descartes's proof that there are bodies.Monte Cook - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):641 – 657.
Hume's Missing Shade of Blue.Reginald O. Savage - 1992 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (2):199 - 206.
Is Hume's shade of blue a red Herring?William H. Williams - 1992 - Synthese 92 (1):83 - 99.
Why Hume's counterexample is insignificant and why it is not.Nancy Kendrick - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):955 – 979.
Simple Ideas and Hume’s Missing Shade of Blue.Emily Kelahan - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (3):809-825.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23-40.
A Test: Hume's Missing Shade of Blue.Jonathan Finch - 2015 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 13 (3):219-228.
Hume's missing shade of blue.John Morreall - 1982 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (3):407-415.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
120 (#178,704)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hume and the missing shade of blue.Robert J. Fogelin - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):263-272.

Add more references