An application of simple majority rule to a group with an even number of voters

Theory and Decision 94 (1):83-95 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the basic model of Condorcet’s jury theorem and in the literature that follows, an odd-numbered group of voters is assumed so that the simple majority rule can be used. We show that this assumption is not necessary either in Condorcet’s basic model or in the general framework of dichotomous choice. We first apply simple majority rule to an even-numbered homogeneous fixed-size committee. We then provide a justification for using simple majority rule for an even-numbered heterogeneous fixed-size committee when the competence structure of the committee members is not common knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Generalizing the constrained equal awards rule.Bas Dietzenbacher - 2022 - Theory and Decision 95 (1):131-150.
Anonymity conditions in social choice theory.Donald E. Campbell - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (1):21-39.
Rational choice and public affairs.Tibor R. Machan - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (3):229-258.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (1):106-106.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (1):105-105.
On anonymous and weighted voting systems.Josep Freixas & Montserrat Pons - 2021 - Theory and Decision 91 (4):477-491.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (1):V-VI.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
17 (#1,196,561)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2013 - Social Choice and Welfare 40 (4):1067-1095.

Add more references