Introducing geological wonder: Planetary thinking as a disruption of narcissism

Environmental Values 33 (6):648-664 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since its origin in 15th century European imperialism, the globe has been an object of conquest involving regimes of territorial exclusion and various forms of land abstraction now known as nationalism, colonialism, capitalism, and industrialism. Coming to think like the Earth system and generating politics grounded in it could pose a welcome disruption of these systematically controlling orders only if such planetary thinking is grounded in a nondominating orientation. We propose that this grounding be geological wonder, the open consideration of Earth as a system exceeding human narcissism. Following Dipesh Chakrabarty's distinction between the globe and the planet, we articulate planetarism in an emerging cosmology decentering human life while emphasizing human limits. Globality, by contrast, is a modern, narcissistic formation that geological wonder unsettles. We draw on Martha C. Nussbaum's politics of wonder to articulate a postglobal, disruptive virtue.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-23

Downloads
19 (#1,074,273)

6 months
17 (#172,835)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy David Bendik-Keymer
Case Western Reserve University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory of the Earth.Thomas Nail - 2021 - Stanford University Press.
What is genealogy?Mark Bevir - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):263-275.
The return of the critique of ideologies.Cristina Lafont - 2023 - Constellations 30 (4):390-394.

View all 10 references / Add more references