On procedures for the measurement of questions in quantum mechanics

Foundations of Physics 5 (2):251-255 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is shown that there exist observablesA and Borel setsE such that the procedure “measureA and give as output the number 1 (0) if theA measurement outcome is (is not) inE” does not correspond to a measurement of the proposition observable ℰA(E) usually assigned to such procedures. This result is discussed in terms of limitations on choice powers of observers

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Complete Measurements of Quantum Observables.Juha-Pekka Pellonpää - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (1):71-90.
Quantum measurement and algebraic quantum field theories.B. DeFacio - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (2):185-192.
The algebra of physical magnitudes.R. M. Cooke & J. Hilgevoord - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (5-6):363-373.
Algorithmic Measurement Procedures.Aldo F. G. Solis-Labastida & Jorge G. Hirsch - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (8):749-763.
Objectivity in Quantum Measurement.Sheng-Wen Li, C. Y. Cai, X. F. Liu & C. P. Sun - 2018 - Foundations of Physics 48 (6):654-667.
Quantum Measurement.Paul Busch - 2016 - Cham: Imprint: Springer. Edited by Pekka Lahti, Juha-Pekka Pellonpää & Kari Ylinen.
The Observer in the Quantum Experiment.Bruce Rosenblum & Fred Kuttner - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (8):1273-1293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
45 (#495,167)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Foundations of Set Theory.Abraham Adolf Fraenkel & Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1973 - Atlantic Highlands, NJ, USA: Elsevier.
Lattice Theory.Garrett Birkhoff - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):155-157.

Add more references