The Harm of Social Media to Public Reason

Topoi 43 (5): 1433–1449 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is commonly agreed that so-called echo chambers and epistemic bubbles, associated with social media, are detrimental to liberal democracies. Drawing on John Rawls’s political liberalism, we offer a novel explanation of why social media platforms amplifying echo chambers and epistemic bubbles are likely contributing to the violation of the democratic norms connected to the ideal of public reason. These norms are clarified with reference to the method of (full) reflective equilibrium, which we argue should be cultivated as a civic virtue in the context of political justification. The paper demonstrates how epistemic bubbles and echo chambers are likely to be detrimental to the disposition to follow the method of reflective equilibrium in the political context. Based on this diagnosis the paper highlights the need for interventions that help cultivate reflective equilibrium as a civic virtue and the need for corresponding interdisciplinary research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-15

Downloads
153 (#147,346)

6 months
153 (#25,308)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Paige Benton
University of Johannesburg
Michael W. Schmidt
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Thi Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.
Epistemic dependence.John Hardwig - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (7):335-349.
Considered Judgment.Catherine Z. Elgin - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references