Ethics After Babel [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):872-874 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are those who think that moral life and moral reflection today are in complete disarray. What is sometimes called "diversity" or "pluralism" is read as nothing but fragmented confusion, Babel. "Relativism," "Incommensurability," "Nihilism" are used as polemical weapons in contemporary ethical debates. After the demise of the varieties of "foundationalism," one wonders what is left of ethics as a philosophic discipline. Furthermore, most philosophers are deeply suspicious of the very idea of a "religious ethics," or that theology has any role to play in the contemporary conversation about the nature and epistemological status of ethics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
34 (#662,312)

6 months
2 (#1,686,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references