Proper environment and the SEP account of biological function

Synthese 190 (9):1503-1517 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The survival enhancing propensity (SEP) account has a crucial role to play in the analysis of proper function. However, a central feature of the account, its specification of the proper environment to which functions are relativized, is seriously underdeveloped. In this paper, I argue that existent accounts of proper environment fail because they either allow too many or too few characters to count as proper functions. While SEP accounts retain their promise, they are unworkable because of their inability to specify this important feature. However, I suggest that this problem can be overcome by the application of a new strategy for specifying proper environment that is grounded in the operation of natural selection and I conclude by offering a first approximation of such an account.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Continuing Usefulness Account of Proper Function.Peter H. Schwartz - 2002 - In André Ariew, Robert Cummins & Mark Perlman (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Does proper function come in degrees?John Matthewson - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (4):1-18.
Organism and artifact: Proper functions in Paley organisms.Sune Holm - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4b):706-713.
Proper function and recent selection.Peter H. Schwartz - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):210-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-10

Downloads
927 (#23,647)

6 months
86 (#72,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?