The semantic significance of Donnellan's distinction

Philosophical Studies 37 (3):281 - 288 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Donnellan's referential/attributive distinction.Scott Soames - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):149 - 168.
Donnellan’s distinction.Michael Devitt - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):511-526.
Russell versus Donnellan on Descriptions.W. J. Pollock - 2022 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 42 (1):40-51.
On an argument of Donnellan's.Edward Oldfield - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (2):199 - 207.
The teetotaler and his Martini.Stefano Predelli - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (5):511–527.
Determiners are phrases.Francesco Pupa - 2022 - Mind and Language 37 (5):893-913.
Explaining Donnellan's Distinction: A Reply.D. E. Over - 1984 - Analysis 44 (4):191 - 194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
111 (#191,915)

6 months
6 (#846,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rod Bertolet
Purdue University

Citations of this work

Donnellan’s distinction.Michael Devitt - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):511-526.
On a fictional ellipsis.Rod Bertolet - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (2):189 - 194.
The epsilon calculus' problematic.B. H. Slater - 1994 - Philosophical Papers 23 (3):217-242.
Does speaker's reference have semantic relevance?David Lumsden - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (1):15 - 21.
Identity, necessity and a prioricity:The fallacy of equivocation.Maria J. Frápolli - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):91-109.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references